"The Matrix" was a very popular and famous science fiction movie from 1999. I have seen "The Matrix" berfore when i was a child who was studying at elementary school. On my fuzzy memories, I was not fully understand about the movie. I just remembered someone can jump very high and very quick reaction. If someone ask me about "The Matrix", I will tell him/her i only focused on the action of the plot like kung fu. I do not know what is the movie's plot in detail. I only knew about some of protagonists have had super powers.
But last Thursday in HUMI class. I had a chance to watch "The Matrix" again. It was refreshing my memories of the movie. I was concentrated to watch it by detail. The protagonist who's name call Neo was a computer hacker has been living in a normal life, until he touched with mysterious person Morpheus. Morpheus took him to the "real world": AD 2199, advanced artificial intelligence from the whole world ruled by machines. Machine to create a simulated environment - The Matrix (the mother) used to control human beings, and humans absorb energy from. Morpheus with his life time to find the "savior"(The One) to destroy the Matrix and lead humanity to overthrow the rule of the machine and rebuild the Earth. He believes that Neo is the savior.
How could Neo go to the "real World"? Morpheus gave him two pills, one is blue, other one is red. And Mprpheus told Neo " You take the blue pill – the story ends, you wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe. You take the red pill – you stay in Wonderland and I show you how deep the rabbit-hole goes."
I stop and think about that a while. I think I would choose to take the red pill. Because of I knew that was not a "real world" I have been living. It was not because of my curiosity. Even thought I can have my normal life and still study in college in "fake world", I do not want to manipulation by others. Living in an imaginary world is totally meaningless. I am living because i have had the feeling of presence. Even 2199 is an unknown to me, even terror and unimaginable. We must face to it. In my position, mainly because I did not want to live in the fictional world. However, the "fake world" is very beautiful place and graceful environment to living it. If you know you are living in a "fake world". Would you still choose to live in there? Human life is very short, if you are lucky, maybe able to survive for several decades. If 10, 20, 30 years later, the "fake world" disillusioned. Will you regret you did not choose to enter the "real world"?
I don't know is that a right choice to take a red pill. I don't know whether it is difficult to imagine the "real world". But I am sure I will not regret my choice. I would like to true to feel my exist, even if only a day.
2011年1月27日 星期四
2011年1月20日 星期四
The IAT
Implicit Association Test proposed some of the questions and exercises for us insight into their own. I have done two of IAT which is Age test and Weight test.
I have completed the Young - Old IAT at first. My result is:
"Your data suggest a strong automatic preference for Young compared to Old."
First it starts with pressing “e” for young people and good words; “i” for old people and bad words. Test consists of several conducted. In the first of the part, pressing "e" for young people; pressing "i" for old people. It was easy job, right? Second, pressing "e" for good words; pressing "i" for bad words. It still an easy one. And then, the third part was switching "e" for old people; "i" for young people. Based on our tests first and second part, we are affected, it is easy to choose the wrong answer. therefore, My test result was stronger preference for young.
My second test is Weight. My result is:
"Your data suggest a slight automatic preference for Thin People compared to Fat People."
The weight test is samily to the age test what I had to done before. Pressing "e" for thin people and good words; pressing "i" for fate people and bad words. Even thought I have had the experience of the test, I still press a wrong answer of the test. After the last test,I do better than last time. So that's why my result is a slight automatic preference for thin people.
According to this two test. My conclusion is the result of my first time to took the test is more genuine and accurate then second test. Because all of the people absorbed the experience of the first time. For this two of IAT test. My personally think that was high accuracy for people testing their implicit association. With my own opinion, I preference young people compared to old. In my deep of heart, I think so. This test was explore my inner feelings. Althought I knew the methods of the test, I still totally agree with my result. I do not discriminate against fat people. That's my implicit's feelings. After this IAT test, I know more and more my self.
I have completed the Young - Old IAT at first. My result is:
"Your data suggest a strong automatic preference for Young compared to Old."
First it starts with pressing “e” for young people and good words; “i” for old people and bad words. Test consists of several conducted. In the first of the part, pressing "e" for young people; pressing "i" for old people. It was easy job, right? Second, pressing "e" for good words; pressing "i" for bad words. It still an easy one. And then, the third part was switching "e" for old people; "i" for young people. Based on our tests first and second part, we are affected, it is easy to choose the wrong answer. therefore, My test result was stronger preference for young.
My second test is Weight. My result is:
"Your data suggest a slight automatic preference for Thin People compared to Fat People."
The weight test is samily to the age test what I had to done before. Pressing "e" for thin people and good words; pressing "i" for fate people and bad words. Even thought I have had the experience of the test, I still press a wrong answer of the test. After the last test,I do better than last time. So that's why my result is a slight automatic preference for thin people.
According to this two test. My conclusion is the result of my first time to took the test is more genuine and accurate then second test. Because all of the people absorbed the experience of the first time. For this two of IAT test. My personally think that was high accuracy for people testing their implicit association. With my own opinion, I preference young people compared to old. In my deep of heart, I think so. This test was explore my inner feelings. Althought I knew the methods of the test, I still totally agree with my result. I do not discriminate against fat people. That's my implicit's feelings. After this IAT test, I know more and more my self.
Informal Writing
In the first, before I saw the video of examined life, I did not have any ideas and also the knowledge about philosophy. But after I saw the "examined life" by Astra taylor, I got different experience of my live. I got a question of worthy of reflection.
According to the video, Peter Singer is walking on the 5th Avenue where has many all of the expensive brand's stores located in New York. And he walked in front of the shoes store. About threeteen years ago, he wrote an article called "Famine, Affluence, and Morality.” He talked about a ethics of a child drowning in a shallow pond and an experience shoes. And you could save his life or buy an experience shoes. Most of peoples will say that was easy to choose, must choose to save a child life and sacrifice their shoes. Unfortunately, Peter Singer said he agree with that, but he still said why don't donate a pair shoes which you can give money to association that help children in the third world. It was an ethics concept. Basically, we just donate the money what you want to spend on your shoes. In fact, it is easy to give up to buy a pair of shoes. But, Do everyone donate the money what you want to spend on shoes? Even thought we just donate shoes' money, it is enough to association many of children in the third world.
If you can spend too much money on the top of brand's shoes, that's mean you have enough money on your life. If so, for you, the expensive of brand's shoes will not affect your normal life. Therefore, we should consider ethics of life. Why do we spend money on unnecessary? That's my appreciate from experience of examined of life by Astra taylor.
According to the video, Peter Singer is walking on the 5th Avenue where has many all of the expensive brand's stores located in New York. And he walked in front of the shoes store. About threeteen years ago, he wrote an article called "Famine, Affluence, and Morality.” He talked about a ethics of a child drowning in a shallow pond and an experience shoes. And you could save his life or buy an experience shoes. Most of peoples will say that was easy to choose, must choose to save a child life and sacrifice their shoes. Unfortunately, Peter Singer said he agree with that, but he still said why don't donate a pair shoes which you can give money to association that help children in the third world. It was an ethics concept. Basically, we just donate the money what you want to spend on your shoes. In fact, it is easy to give up to buy a pair of shoes. But, Do everyone donate the money what you want to spend on shoes? Even thought we just donate shoes' money, it is enough to association many of children in the third world.
If you can spend too much money on the top of brand's shoes, that's mean you have enough money on your life. If so, for you, the expensive of brand's shoes will not affect your normal life. Therefore, we should consider ethics of life. Why do we spend money on unnecessary? That's my appreciate from experience of examined of life by Astra taylor.
2011年1月9日 星期日
Coke bottle in Bookstore
Someone wearing Converse tennis shoes
Two Honda civics of the same color, parked side by side in the parking lot
Someone who knows a popular dance move and who can teach that dance move to group members
Bus stop
Euphrat Museum of Art
A student sleeping in the library
Someone who has seen Tron in 3D
a duck
A copy of James Baldwin’s The Fire Next Time
Jamba juice cup
訂閱:
文章 (Atom)